Deeply embedded in our Bill of Rights and our most basic American values is the idea that we the people — not the government — are in charge of our own lives. But there are plenty of people who disagree with that premise and want to control our lives. And those people have a plan.

All of us remember Donald Trump’s presidency: separating families, banning visitors from Muslim countries, stacking the Supreme Court with justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade, and attacking LGBTQ people. Yet as the ACLU’s detailed analysis of Trump and his supporters' policy proposals and rhetoric has shown, if reelected, his administration will likely be far more aggressive and effective in executing its unlawful plans than ever before.

Under a second Trump administration, our federal government could be used to openly discriminate against marginalized communities, to spy on private citizens, and be given authority over what we can and can’t do with our bodies. If such a dystopian view of American life and politics feels like the plot of a Netflix special, consider that this vision of America is what former Trump administration staffers and The Heritage Foundation, a conservative-leaning think tank, have outlined in Project 2025.

Project 2025 is a federal policy agenda and a blueprint for a radical restructuring of the executive branch that would undercut decades of progress and Constitutional values. Though Trump has claimed he is not connected to Project 2025, a CNN report found that 140 people who worked on Project 2025 previously worked in Trump’s administration. The Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts also worked on Trump’s 2016 transition team and has described his organization’s role in Project 2025 as “institutionalizing Trumpism.” Trump himself told a conference, after taking a flight with Roberts, “they’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do.”

Project 2025, Explained

While the ACLU doesn’t endorse or oppose candidates for elected office, we recognize how Project 2025 would erode our freedoms and our democracy. Project 2025's largest publication, “Mandate For Leadership,” includes a long list of extreme policy recommendations that empower Congress and the executive branch to hack away at our civil liberties and civil rights.

At the ACLU we’ve been fighting unlawful attempts to curtail our rights for more than 100 years. We’re prepared to use all of the tools at our disposal — litigation, legislation, advocacy, and grassroots mobilization — to ensure our nation lives up to the promise of the Constitution. But this fight isn’t just about policies or procedures — it’s about people.

Life Under Project 2025

Take, for example, an undocumented father living in Texas whose spouse and young children are U.S. citizens. The undocumented father is injured in a workplace accident, but in Project 2025’s America, he will have to choose between forgoing treatment or risk being separated from his family.

Currently, policy dictates that immigration agents avoid arresting or detaining suspected noncitizens in “protected areas” like schools, churches, and hospitals. But Project 2025 calls to weaponize these crucial common spaces as part of a broader anti-immigrant agenda that includes co-opting state and local police to help carry out a mass deportation plan. Nobody should have to choose between the pain of an untreated injury and the agony of being torn away from their children, but Project 2025 is designed to create exactly those kinds of impossible decisions for millions of immigrants and mixed-status families.

This example is hypothetical, but the risk is not. We’ve already seen how damaging family separation can be for children and parents, we know that immigration detention has a deadly track record of abuse and medical neglect, and we have heard time and again how devastating deportation can be across generations.

When the government decides how we are permitted to live, people and communities suffer. Imagine a 27-year-old woman in eastern Washington State who has a young son and becomes pregnant. She works two jobs, but struggles to make ends meet. She knows that having another child would be detrimental to her and her son and wants to end her pregnancy. But she lives several hours from the nearest abortion provider. She doesn’t have a car and she risks losing her job if she takes time off to travel to the clinic. Today, she would be able to do what 20 percent of people seeking abortions do and use telehealth to contact a provider and have FDA-approved abortion pills sent to her.

However, Project 2025 calls for a presidential administration to push the post-Dobbs epidemic of abortion bans into blue states like Washington. The Project has called for the misuse of a 150-year-old anti-obscenity law to prosecute health care providers for mailing abortion pills. If Project 2025 succeeds, that means the pregnant woman in Washington State won’t be able to get an abortion and will be forced to carry her pregnancy against her will and endure labor, possibly putting her own health and the wellbeing of her family at risk.

To read more click on the picture!